book on halachos of marital relations

I accompanied my son and husband to the seforim store today. While they went in search of what my son wanted (some in stock, some had to be ordered), I browsed through some of the marriage books on the shelf. I would love some reader feedback on this.

In the book, Guidelines: Questions and Answers about the Laws of Family Purity by Elozor Barclay, Yitzchok Jaeger Targum Press, 2004, on p. 135 there is a text given for a "bracho" (though it lacks shem and malchus) for the groom to say upon his bride's confirmation of dam bethulim. It begins Baruch ata asher zag egoz began eden . . . and concludes habocher bezro shel Avraham.
I have never come across the concept of this text; it was, certainly, not mentioned by my kallah instructor or any of the books on the subject I've encountered up until this point. Yet, the book does not present it as a novel or merely suggested idea but as a given that this is what is done. Anyone else heard of this?

The second book of note is Taharas Am Yisroel: A Guide to the Halachos of Jewish Marriage by Rabbi Shaul Wagschal.
It was first published in 1979. The one in the store was the 4th edition from 2002 (Judaica Press). On pp. 122-123, the topic is 'The Designated Times for Oinoh." It contains the usual information about frequency with the warning that a man may sap his strength which is needed for kollel or work, so his wife should understand and not demand too much. But what really got me was point #7: "A kallo may not exactly know what oinoh means, [I am refraining from adding my comment in here] but she should accept that this is the way Hashem planned the complete union of husband and wife, though we do not understand why [bold in the source]. She should also know that this is the only way in which a woman can become pregnant."
[!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]
Shall I infer that with test tube babies, oinah can be considered irrelevant? This is the argument of the Victorian age, that wives must endure so that they can experience the joys of motherhood.

Speaking of motherhood, there are a scant two pages that address the issue of "Torah Views on Family Planning" -- from midway down p. 124 to the very top of p. 126. Forget methods, the number and genders of children already born, etc., there is no need to discuss all that; the answer is simple -- no planning, period.

Comments

Josh M. said…
The bracha is found in Shu"A Eh"E 63:2 as a yesh omrim, with shem u-malchus. However, since the bracha is not mentioned in Shas, the Bach says to say it without shem u-malchus, while the Maharshal says that the minhag is not to say it at all.

The Aruch HaShulchan has more information on the bracha, while also noting that nowadays the bracha is not said.
Ariella's blog said…
Thank you, Josh. Chaim now showed me the text in the Aruch Hashulachan. I am still puzzled at the inclusion of such a practice no longer practiced in a book that is intended to present practical halacha (one would think as currently practiced). It is not at all ambivalent in declaring that the chasson should say this. They did not mention a feast of fish. Interestingly, the Arush Hashulchan declares the belief that a woman does not conceive from bia rishona, so that the celebration is for the beginning of her fertility. Biologically speaking, though, that is not the case. I even know a woman who said she took a pregnancy test during the week of sheva brachos, which confirmed she had conceived immediately.
Gila S said…
Our mesader kiddushin mentioned to my future husband that there was such a bracha, and suggested that the kallah might prefer it as a way of marking things rather than just moving over into the other bed and going to sleep. The idea weirded me out at the time, and we opted against it.
Ariella's blog said…
Gila, that's very interesting. I bet the mesader kiddushin had this book, as the usual sources for halacha indicate that it is not said. I think I would also find it rather weird. In any case, the bride would have to get up and check herself before giving the go-ahead to the chasson for this, according to the book's direction.
Gila S said…
Our mesader kiddushin essentially threw this out there as an option, essentially saying that this bracha (over a kos, if I recall correctly, so it would require getting up anyway, but it would ceremonially mark the occasion) was something that we might want to do, not that he was particularly recommending it. I was not part of this conversation, but my husband didn't imply that the rav thought it was mandatory. My husband wasn't particularly gung-ho on the idea, either.

The rav is of an extremely Brisker background, for what it's worth.

Popular Posts